Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), although it's a bit thicker and heavier. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has a little lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better (4K) video quality, a way larger camera aperture and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.