Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50, with a global score of 86.3 against 83.8. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy A50, it is heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a way higher video quality and a way bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.