Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting an 86.6 score against 86.3. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. The Galaxy A50s is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it lighter and a little thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better looking display than Galaxy A50s, because although it has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a more megapixels back facing camera, a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.