Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A51, getting an 86.3 score against 85.5. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is extremely newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Galaxy A51. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy A51 has Android 11 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a way larger aperture and a camera in the back with more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.