Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 86.3. Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly older, a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit worse pixel quantity per inch in the screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little bit larger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features more storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A51 5G features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy A51 5G's battery life is very similar to the battery duration in Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot larger aperture for better photography in low-light situations and a more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.