Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | -- |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 has a score of 90.7, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's general score of 86.3. Even being the best we are comparing, the Galaxy A52 is an extremely older, just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier device than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little worse pixels count per inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A52, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A52 takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much tinier aperture and a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a battery life that is just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.