Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s has an overall score of 91.1, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 global score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Even being the best phone in this review, Galaxy A52s's design is notably older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a little lower pixels count in each inch in the display, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A52s and Motorola Edge 50 Pro both count with very similar batteries performance.
The Galaxy A52s shoots a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a camera with a lot higher 64 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.