Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A6, getting a overall score of 86.3 against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a noticeably newer phone than the Samsung Galaxy A6, but it is a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, a larger display and a better display density. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because it has a larger aperture, a way more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.