Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s overall score of 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction has the same weight than Galaxy A7 (2017), but it is a bit thicker. Galaxy A7 (2017) has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite higher pixels count in each inch of screen, a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way more mega pixels camera, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features longer battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.