Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is better than Galaxy A70, with an 86.3 score against 76.9. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it gives a lot of extra features. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a lot newer than the Galaxy A70, it's just a little thicker and a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A70. Both have the same display density, a display with the same size and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and a lot larger sensor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A70's battery performance is very similar to Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.