Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a general score of 87.5 against 86.3. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Galaxy A71 is an notably older cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it a bit lighter and a bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy A71 counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy A71. Both have a screen with the same size, the same pixels density and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A71 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a much tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 and Motorola Edge 50 Pro both count with similar batteries.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.