Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a overall score of 92.9 against 86.3. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an a lot older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker device than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both have the same number of pixels per inch of display, a same size screen and the same 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW takes a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting photographs and video in low light environments and a smaller back camera sensor which gives a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro and Galaxy A71 5G UW feature similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.