Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A8 (2018)'s 79.2 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is way newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy A8 (2018)'s, although it's just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better memory for apps and games than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 50 percent more battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a bigger aperture for better low light photography and video, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.