Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 (2018)'s score of 85.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer cellphone than the Galaxy A9 (2018), but it is a little bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a quite bigger screen, a quite higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos, a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.