Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F41's overall score of 85.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a notably newer phone, and it is also a bit thinner and a bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy F41. These phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy F41 has Android 11, offering a couple nice extra features.
Galaxy F41 counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better looking display than Galaxy F41, because although it has a bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a really brighter screen, a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy F41 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality and a much smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Galaxy F41 counts with greater battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.