Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a score of 88.1 against 86.3. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F62 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Even though the Galaxy F62 is a better cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, we must highlight that it is also older, somewhat heavier and thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the same display density and a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has way more brightness. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy F62 captures slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture and a smaller camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.