Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a general score of 97.6 against 86.3. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is an extremely older and way heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but Samsung made it somewhat thinner anyway.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density. The Galaxy Fold has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels, a larger aperture and a lot larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy Fold's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one, both of them have exactly the same 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.