Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy M30's 82.4 overall score. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a way newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy M30, although it is a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Galaxy M30 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy M30 counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy M30, because it has a way higher video resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.