Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a general score of 87.7 against 86.3. The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a incredibly older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a sharper screen than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a just a little greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy M51 has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy M51's camera is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much smaller aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos and a tinier sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, it also counts with a back camera with a way better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy M51, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.