Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a 98.9 score against 86.3. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a somewhat heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but both of them are equally thin.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a bit lower pixels count per inch in the display, a little smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures better pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot better 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos and a much better video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.