Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, getting an 86.3 score against 79.3. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a notably newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, although it's a bit heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version.
Galaxy Note 5 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy Note 5 features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less processing cores (although faster) and 8 GB less RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger camera aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 50 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.