Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a general score of 89 against 86.3. The Galaxy Note10 design is a bit thinner and lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it was released 5 years before. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite inferior pixels number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better resolution camera and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.