Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's global score of 86.2. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has Android 11 version, so it provides you some extra features and increased performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a much newer device, and it's also just a little bit thinner and a little bit lighter than the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both of them have a higher pixel number per inch of screen, a same size display and exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bigger storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations, a much larger sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's battery life is just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.