Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note5's score of 80.2. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a lot newer than the Galaxy Note5, it is just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit lower pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Galaxy Note5 has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.