Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7, with a general score of 86.3 against 79.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a incredibly newer phone than Samsung Galaxy Note7, but it's just a bit heavier and a bit thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2400px resolution and a just a bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note7 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory and lesser processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video, a much bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.