Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with an 88.3 score against 86.3. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S10 body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a way worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.