Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a 93.6 score against 86.3. Although the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is noticeably older and just a little heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is still a bit thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, they both have a screen with the same size.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture and a way bigger sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy S10 5G has a battery life that's very similar to Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.