Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's global score of 86.3. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction has the same thickness and weight than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Galaxy S10 Lite features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better display than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. They have the same number of pixels per display inch, a same size screen and the same exact 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a way smaller aperture which is not good for low light images, a lower resolution camera, a lot smaller sensor offering a much lower image quality and a lower 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy S10 Lite's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery life in Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.