Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a global score of 94.8 against 86.3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. Samsung Galaxy S20 is an notably older device than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but it is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S20, because although it has a much lower amount of pixels in each screen inch and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a little bigger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a little better battery performance than Galaxy S20, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a way larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.