Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 FE has a global score of 90.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's 86.3 score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S20 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy S20 FE is a better phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it must be told that it's also a lot older, just a little heavier and just a little thicker.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per display inch, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy S20 FE's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery duration in Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a camera with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger aperture for better captures in low light situations and a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.