Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a 98 score against 86.3. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is older, a little thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little bit lower number of pixels per inch in the screen and a little smaller display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures much better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much tinier sensor which provides a way worse image and video quality and a way smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.