Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | -- |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a overall score of 89.1 against 86.3. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is way older than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's design is a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better looking screen than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution and a lot larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy S21 FE's battery lifetime is just as good as the battery lifetime in Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.