Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a score of 93.4 against 86.3. Even though Galaxy S22 is extremely older than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy S22 counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S22 features a bit sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, much lower brightness and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor and a lot smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot higher video definition. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.