Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, with a 95.4 score against 86.3. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, we must note that it's also incredibly older, a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a quite darker screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 384 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.