Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S25, getting an 86.3 score against 82.6. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 14 OS, so they should offer all the same OS features. Samsung Galaxy S25's processing unit is very similar to the processing unit in Motorola Edge 50 Pro, and although the Samsung Galaxy S25 has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy S25 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a brighter screen and a just a bit higher pixel quantity in each display inch. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S25 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a way smaller camera aperture which is not good for low light photography and video, and they both have a 50 mega pixels camera in the back, the Galaxy S25 also counts with a much higher video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 13 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.