Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 general score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the previous 14 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner, but heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot larger camera aperture, a lot larger sensor which offers a much better photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 496 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 61 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.