Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a global score of 86.3, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 global score. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and a graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a much more MP camera in the back, a lot bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video and a lot bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.