Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is slightly better than the Galaxy S7, getting a general score of 86.3 against 79.5. Although Motorola Edge 50 Pro is noticeably newer than the Galaxy S7, it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Galaxy S7 counts with a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 less cpu cores and 8 GB less RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with just a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has much lower brightness and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality pictures, a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a lot better 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.