Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a newer and thinner phone than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a screen that is just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has way darker display and a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and 8 GB lesser RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.