Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active's 81.9 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's design is way newer, thinner and lighter than the Galaxy S8 Active. The Galaxy S8 Active features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a way worse pixels amount per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back camera with much more megapixels, a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.