Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy S9, having a general score of 86.3 against 83.3. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Pro is heavier than Galaxy S9, it's a bit thinner and also much newer. The Galaxy S9 features a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S9, because although it has a much lower display density and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a camera with a way higher 50 megapixels resolution, a bigger aperture to take better images in low-light situations and a much larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.