Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 86.3 score against 80.1. These phones use Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has an older 14 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's body is extremely newer, a lot thinner and much lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much lower screen density and a little worse 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a much bigger display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a way higher 50 MP resolution camera, a lot higher video definition, a much bigger camera sensor and a larger aperture. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery performance is just as good as Motorola Edge 50 Pro's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.