Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a global score of 86.3 against 81. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is notably newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, providing you some additional features and enhanced performance.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a larger diafragm aperture, a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.