Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro's score of 86.3. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lot older than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, it's body is thinner and just a little bit lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a little lower pixels quantity per inch of screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a same size display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations, a much higher resolution back camera and a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 36% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.