Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 3, having an 86.3 score against 85.6. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro construction is noticeably newer, but thicker and just a bit heavier than the Galaxy Z Flip 3.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little lower display density, they both have a same size display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 36% greater battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a much larger aperture and a much better resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.