Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a global score of 94.6 against 86.3. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it's incredibly heavier and was released many years before. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 both have very similar battery durations. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better camera than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera, a lot larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.