Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.88 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, having a 90.6 score against 86.3. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a incredibly older and a lot heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it much thinner anyway.
Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Pro. They have 8 cpu cores and 12 GB of RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a much bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a much better resolution back facing camera. Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.