Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.85 x 3.49 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.44 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 295.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, having a overall score of 86.3 against 77.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a incredibly newer and somewhat lighter phone than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, although it's also just a little thicker. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because it has a bit better pixel density, a bit larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro takes a lot better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Max 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations, a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a much bigger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Max 2 has greater battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.