Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, getting an 86.3 score against 76.6. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10 version, offering a couple nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is extremely newer, just a little bit lighter and just a little thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bigger display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a lot bigger aperture, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot higher video definition.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.