Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.3 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.40 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a general score of 86.3, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro's score of 81.1. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a extremely newer phone, and it's also lighter and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have a screen with the same size, the same display pixel density and exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a way tinier aperture and a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has a 5020mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.